SeaStates.US 2014

How Well Does Your State Protect Your Coastal Waters?


Second Annual National Ranking Shows Most Coastal States Failing to Protect Oceans

View Marine Conservation Institute News Release 07/14/2014

Executive Summary

Our finding: Few states provide strong protection for marine ecosystems. There is still an enormous need for ocean protection.

People’s lives and livelihoods depend critically on healthy oceans, but human activities now threaten marine life and, hence, our lives. Marine biologists recommend creating strong no-take marine reserves to safeguard marine life. While many coastal states and territories have established scattered marine protected areas, these zones are often weak and temporary, offering few benefits to marine life and people. In contrast, no-take marine reserves are free from extractive activities such as fishing, mining and oil & gas development. Protecting biodiversity increases the abundance of fishes and promotes the quantity of marine life exported to surrounding areas, securing food resources for millions of people.

Federal Waters

This year we expanded our analysis to waters between the limit of state jurisdiction and the US exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which includes waters out to 200 nautical miles (230.16 statute miles) from the coast. Very few no-take areas exist in the US EEZ. While there are a large number of fishing regulations, only the Southeast Region (0.02% no-take area) and the Pacific Islands (6.47% no-take area) protect more than a single square mile of their region with no-take marine reserves.

US States & Territories

The best-protected states and territories are American Samoa, California, and the US Virgin Islands. In the last year, Oregon was the only US state to increase protection of its waters. Disappointingly, the majority of states do not have marine reserves in their coastal waters, which generally include all marine area within 3 nautical miles from shore.

*All other states have 0% no-take area coverage.

What Changed This Year?

The biggest change in the ranking of states’ no-take area this year was American Samoa which moved up from 10th overall to 2nd most area set aside in marine reserves. This was due to increased protection in Rose Atoll Marine National Monument. Oregon’s two new marine reserves at Cape Perpetua and Cascade Head moved the state up to 5th place overall, ahead of Florida and Puerto Rico. Another big advance in the past year occurred in the US possessions in the Pacific. No-take areas were established from shore to 12 nautical miles (13.8 statute miles) in the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (PRIMNM) for a total of 5,277 square miles of newly protected ocean. These small islands and atolls in the Central Pacific Ocean are not formally a state or territory and are entirely managed by the federal government. Thus, possessions were not included in our 2013 SeaStates report.

Next year we hope to see a dramatic increase in the amount of no-take protection following President Obama’s proposal to expand the Pacifi c Remote Islands Marine National Monument.

Hawaiian Waters

This year we separated the Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) from the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI). We did this to reflect the differences between the large, inhabited main islands and the uninhabited atolls within the NWHI, which are entirely protected within state waters. This provides a fairer comparison with other states.

Marine Protected Area versus Marine Reserve?

Studies show that no-take marine reserves are the most effective type of protected areas. Marine reserves prohibit all extractive activities and therefore deliver the conservation benefits that communities need and expect from protecting these areas. A marine reserve is analogous to a savings account, if you maintain a principle balance you can earn an income from it. In contrast, throughout the US most marine protected areas offer limited protections. For example, some may allow bottom trawling or other types of fishing, while others may allow dredging, mining, oil and gas development and other detrimental activities. Many so-called protected areas are more appropriately termed fisheries management areas as they do not have strong conservation objectives. Fishing regulations do offer some protections in the form of restricted fishing seasons, gear choices, or prohibitions on certain species, but they do not offer the full suite of safeguards critical to ensuring the resilience of our ocean ecosystems. To successfully recover and maintain healthy oceans, scientists recommend protecting at least 20% of each biogeographic region in no-take marine reserves. Currently, only 1.26% out of all US waters are protected at this level.

“Whether you love our oceans for their beauty, for their fishes and marine mammals, or for generating half of the oxygen we breathe, you should want them to be strongly protected. But most states in this report get a score of zero and only a handful are protecting even 1%. That’s not good enough when our oceans are facing grave threats like overfishing and pollution. America’s oceans and people deserve better,” said eminent marine biologist and President of Mission Blue, Dr. Sylvia Earle. “The United States has a long way to go if we want to be a world-leader in marine conservation.”


Thanks to Jordan Gass and the NOAA MPA Center for providing information. We also thank our generous supporters of MPAtlas: Waitt Foundation, Holland America Line, Winslow Foundation and Arntz Family Foundation.