Ocean Current header

NOAA found:

  • New species of algae 
  • 20 species of fish not yet recorded in the   North-western Hawaiian Islands
  • 15 species of fish that had not yet been recorded at Johnston Atoll
For more information about these and other marine issues, please contact the Marine Conservation Institute's policy and science experts.
Facebook  Twitter
The Marine Conservation Institute is a nonprofit, science-based organization dedicated to saving wild ocean places, for us and future generations.
122 C Street NW
Suite 240
Washington, DC 20001
202 546 5346

Did you know that humans have only laid eyes on about 5% of what lies beneath the ocean's surface?  Shocked?  We were.  It feels a bit like the Dark Ages - when no single civilization knew about more than 5% of the terrestrial realm around them. Fortunately, we're making progress.


Recently, a research team completed a 26 day dive expedition in the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument in the northwest Hawaiian Islands to explore what few or none have seen before.  NOAA researchers made some pretty astounding discoveries.  The team discovered a new species of deep-water algae and observed over 20 species of fish that had never been recorded in the Marine National Monument. They also collected the first recorded samples of black coral and witnessed 15 species of fish that had never before been documented at Johnston Atoll.  (See article below)


When Marine Conservation Institute worked with other groups to encourage the Bush Administration to protect the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument in 2006 and Rose Atoll and the Pacific Remote Islands in 2009 from threats to ocean life, we expected the areas to provide a vibrant laboratory for new discoveries.  Each expedition into the Pacific Remote Islands still manages to surprise us with the sheer number of new species and new understanding of important marine processes.  


Bit by bit, scientists are exploring the 95% of our oceans that have never been seen or sampled, and so, bit by bit, the Dark Ages are receding.  But we can never explore what has been destroyed or learn about an ecosystem that's been so diminished by overfishing or pollution that it has become unrecognizable.  It's important to protect marine life and places not only for future generations, but so that we get a chance to learn about them at all. 


There are so many discoveries still waiting for us under the sea, and finding them takes both money for investigation and the will to preserve important places.  (See article below)



New Discoveries Tie Northwestern Hawaiian Islands to Johnston Atoll

Jacks over deep algal bed at Johnston Atoll. Jacks (Uraspis helvola) over deep algal bed at Johnston Atoll. Credit: Greg McFall/NOAA

Members of a research expedition to Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument returned with specimens of new species of deep-water algae from the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI), and the first recorded specimens of black coral from Johnston Atoll. They also saw and photographed more than 20 species of fishes never before recorded from the NWHI, and 15 species of fishes never before recorded at Johnston Atoll.

The team visited Nihoa, Mokumanamana, French Frigate Shoals and Laysan Island in Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, and then Johnston Atoll National Wildlife Refuge in the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument, approximately 860 miles (1,390 km) west of Honolulu. Johnston is regarded as a key "stepping stone" for a number of central and south Pacific marine species to colonize the NWHI. The findings represent a significant increase in the known biodiversity of Hawaiian coral reefs, and provides insights into how Johnston Atoll contributes to the diversity of our reefs in Hawai'i.

Table coral in Hawai'i is limited to French Frigate Shoals and neighboring atolls. Table coral (Acropora cytherea) is common throughout the tropical Pacific and at Johnston, but in Hawaiʻi its distribution is limited to French Frigate Shoals and neighboring atolls. Credit: Greg McFall/NOAA

The team spent 26 days aboard the NOAA shipHiʻialakai conducting research dives on deep coral reefs below 200 feet in the NWHI and Johnston Atoll. Scientists collected samples of fish, corals, other invertebrates and algae for population genetics analysis; surveyed deep coral reefs and associated reef fish communities; searched for invasive alien species of coral and algae; and conducted archaeological surveys of the Howland, a late 1800s whaling ship that wrecked at Johnston Atoll.

This expedition marked NOAA's first full deployment of closed-circuit rebreathers on a research cruise. Rebreathers recycle the gases that divers breathe, removing carbon dioxide and actively managing oxygen levels, allowing for extended dive times and more efficient decompression at depths not accessible using conventional SCUBA.

NOAA rebreather divers conduct coral, algae, and fish surveys at 200 feet at Laysan Island. NOAA rebreather divers Daniel Wagner and Randy Kosaki conduct coral, algae, and fish surveys at 200 feet at Laysan Island in Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Credit: Greg McFall/NOAA

The scientific team included researchers from NOAA's Office of National Marine Sanctuaries' Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument and Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary, the University of Hawaiʻi, the Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, and the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

Read the Press Release.

Watch video clips from the expedition.

To see more photos, click here.




 Rockets Top Submarines: Space Exploration Dollars Dwarf Ocean Spending


Credit: AP Photo/NOAA

Via the Center for American Progress

"Star Trek" would have us believe that space is the final frontier, but with apologies to the armies of Trekkies, their oracle might be a tad off base. Though we know little about outer space, we still have plenty of frontiers to explore here on our home planet. And they're losing the race of discovery.

Hollywood giant James Cameron, director of mega-blockbusters such as "Titanic" and "Avatar," brought this message to Capitol Hill last week, along with the single-seat submersible that he used to become the third human to journey to the deepest point of the world's oceans - the Marianas Trench. By contrast, more than 500 people have journeyed into space - including Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL), who sits on the committee before which Cameron testified - and 12 people have actually set foot on the surface of the moon.

All it takes is a quick comparison of the budgets for NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, to understand why space exploration is outpacing its ocean counterpart by such a wide margin.

In fiscal year 2013 NASA's annual exploration budget was roughly $3.8 billion. That same year, total funding for everything NOAA does - fishery management, weather and climate forecasting, ocean research and management, among many other programs - was about $5 billion, and NOAA's Office of Exploration and Research received just $23.7 million. Something is wrong with this picture.

Space travel is certainly expensive. But as Cameron proved with his dive that cost approximately $8 million, deep-sea exploration is pricey as well. And that's not the only similarity between space and ocean travel: Both are dark, cold, and completely inhospitable to human life.

Yet space travel excites Americans' imaginations in a way ocean exploration never has. To put this in terms Cameron may be familiar with, just think of how stories are told on screens both big and small: Space dominates, with "Star Trek," "Star Wars," "Battlestar Galactica," "Buck Rogers in the 25th Century," and "2001 A Space Odyssey." Then there are B-movies such as "Plan Nine From Outer Space" and everything ever mocked on "Mystery Science Theater 2000." There are even parodies: "Spaceballs," "Galaxy Quest," and "Mars Attacks!" And let's not forget Cameron's own contributions: "Aliens" and "Avatar."

When it comes to the ocean, we have "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea," "Sponge Bob Square Pants," and Cameron's somewhat lesser-known film "The Abyss." And that's about it.

This imbalance in pop culture is illustrative of what plays out in real life.

We rejoiced along with the NASA mission-control room when the Mars rover landed on the red planet late last year. One particularly exuberant scientist, known as "Mohawk Guy" for his audacious hairdo, became a minor celebrity and even fielded his share of spontaneous marriage proposals. But when Cameron bottomed out in the Challenger Deep more than 36,000 feet below the surface of the sea, it was met with resounding indifference from all but the dorkiest of ocean nerds such as myself.

Part of this incongruity comes from access. No matter where we live, we can go outside on a clear night, look up into the sky, and wonder about what's out there. We're presented with a spectacular vista of stars, planets, meteorites, and even the occasional comet or aurora. We have all been wishing on stars since we were children. Only the lucky few can gaze out at the ocean from their doorstep, and even those who do cannot see all that lies beneath the waves.

As a result, the facts about ocean exploration are pretty bleak. Humans have laid eyes on less than 5 percent of the ocean, and we have better maps of the surface of Mars than we do of America's exclusive economic zone - the undersea territory reaching out 200 miles from our shores.

Sure, space is sexy. But the oceans are too. To those intrigued by the quest for alien life, consider this: Scientists estimate that we still have not discovered 91 percent of the species that live in our oceans. And some of them look pretty outlandish. Go ahead and Google the deepsea hatchetfish, frill shark, or Bathynomus giganteus.

In a time of shrinking budgets and increased scrutiny on the return for our investments, we should be taking a long, hard look at how we are prioritizing our exploration dollars. If the goal of government spending is to spur growth in the private sector, entrepreneurs are far more likely to find inspiration down in the depths of the ocean than up in the heavens. The ocean already provides us with about half the oxygen we breathe, our single largest source of protein, a wealth of mineral resources, key ingredients for pharmaceuticals, and marine biotechnology.

Of course space exportation does have benefits beyond the "cool factor" of putting people on the moon and astronaut-bards playing David Bowie covers in space. Inventions created to facilitate space travel have become ubiquitous in our lives - cell-phone cameras, scratch-resistant lenses, and water-filtration systems, just to name a few - and research conducted in outer space has led to breakthroughs here on earth in the technological and medical fields. Yet despite far-fetched plans to mine asteroids for rare metals, the only tangible goods brought back from space to date remain a few piles of moon rocks.

The deep seabed is a much more likely source of so-called rare-earth metals than distant asteroids. Earlier this year the United Nations published its first plan for management of mineral resources beneath the high seas that are outside the jurisdiction of any individual country. The United States has not been able to participate in negotiations around this policy because we are not among the 185 nations that have ratified the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, which governs such activity.

With or without the United States on board, the potential for economic development in the most remote places on the planet is vast and about to leap to the next level. Earlier this year Japan announced that it has discovered a massive supply of rare earth both within its exclusive economic zone and in international waters. This follows reports in 2011 that China sent at least one exploratory mission to the seabed beneath international waters in the Pacific Ocean. There is a real opportunity for our nation to lead in this area, but we must invest and join the rest of the world in creating the governance structure for these activities.

Toward the end of last week's hearing, Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), who chairs the Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries, and Coast Guard, hypothetically asked where we would be today if we had spent half as much money exploring the oceans as we have spent exploring space. Given the current financial climate in Congress, we won't find the answer to his question on Capitol Hill.

But there may be another way.

Cameron is currently in preproduction on the second and third "Avatar" films. He says the former will be set on an ocean planet. No one except he and his fellow producers at 20th Century Fox really know how much the first installment of the movie series cost, but estimates peg it at approximately $250 million - or 10 times the total funding for NOAA's Ocean Exploration program. Since the original "Avatar" grossed more than $2 billion at the box office worldwide, if NASA isn't willing to hand over a bit of its riches to help their oceanic co-explorers, maybe Cameron and his studio partners can chip a percent or two off the gross from "Avatar 2" to help fill the gap.

Come to think of it, if the key to exploring the oceans hinges either on Hollywood giving up profits or Congress increasing spending, maybe we are more likely to mine asteroids after all.

Michael Conathan is the Director of Ocean Policy at the Cen


ter for American Progress. Judy Li, an intern at the Center for American Progress, contributed to this work.